Skip to content

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. What is the C2PA?
  2. How it works
  3. What problems does C2PA solve?
  4. Is C2PA the same as watermarking?
  1. Can C2PA be removed?
  2. Does C2PA use blockchain?
  3. What file formats does C2PA support?
  4. How do I verify C2PA content?
  5. How do I add C2PA to my content?
  1. What is Nikon C2PA?
  2. Which cameras support C2PA?
  3. Which software supports C2PA?
  1. Can C2PA detect AI-generated images?
  2. Does C2PA prevent deepfakes?
  3. How does C2PA label AI-modified content?
  1. Is my personal information exposed?
  2. Can someone forge C2PA signatures?
  3. What happens if my signing key is stolen?
  1. Who is using C2PA?
  2. Is C2PA mandatory?
  3. How much does C2PA cost?
  4. Will social media platforms support C2PA?
  1. C2PA vs EXIF metadata?
  2. C2PA vs watermarks?
  3. C2PA vs blockchain provenance?

Short answer: C2PA is an open standard for verifying the origin and editing history of digital content through cryptographically signed metadata.

Details: The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) provides a technical specification for embedding tamper-evident provenance information into images, videos, audio, and documents. It was formed in 2021 by merging Adobe’s Content Authenticity Initiative and Microsoft/BBC’s Project Origin.

Short answer: C2PA embeds a cryptographically signed “manifest” into media files containing information about creation, edits, and authorship. Any tampering breaks the signature.

Technical flow:

  1. Content created → Manifest generated with metadata
  2. Manifest signed with private key (like HTTPS certificates)
  3. Manifest embedded in file
  4. Content edited → Previous manifest becomes “ingredient”
  5. New manifest created referencing old one
  6. Chain of provenance preserved
  7. Anyone can verify signature and detect tampering

C2PA addresses:

  • Misinformation: Verify news photos/videos haven’t been manipulated
  • AI content transparency: Identify AI-generated or AI-modified content
  • Deepfakes: Prove authenticity of real footage
  • Attribution: Credit original creators
  • Copyright: Demonstrate ownership and licensing
  • Trust erosion: Restore confidence in digital media

No. Key differences:

FeatureC2PAWatermarks
VisibilityInvisible metadataUsually visible
InformationRich structured dataLimited (usually just ID)
Tamper detectionCryptographic signaturesRobustness varies
RemovalEasy to removeDesigned to resist removal
StandardsOpen specificationMany proprietary formats
PurposeProvenance verificationOwnership marking

C2PA focuses on transparency when present, watermarks on persistence when attacked.


Short answer: Yes, C2PA can be removed by stripping metadata, taking screenshots, or re-encoding. This is by design.

Why it’s acceptable:

  • C2PA proves authenticity when present, not prevents removal
  • Absence of C2PA is itself informative (possible tampering)
  • Goal is transparency, not DRM
  • Platforms can flag content without provenance

Analogy: Like a seal on a medicine bottle - easy to break, but you know if it’s been opened.

No. C2PA uses traditional PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) - the same technology as HTTPS/SSL certificates.

Key points:

  • Uses X.509 certificates and digital signatures
  • No cryptocurrency, tokens, or transaction fees
  • Works offline (no internet needed for verification)
  • Much faster and simpler than blockchain
  • Optional: Some implementations add blockchain timestamping as supplement

Currently supported:

  • Images: JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, HEIC/HEIF, TIFF, DNG, SVG, GIF
  • Video: MP4, MOV, AVI
  • Audio: WAV, MP3, M4A
  • Documents: PDF

In development: WebM, additional formats

Easiest method:

Command-line:

Terminal window
c2patool image.jpg

Browser: Install Content Credentials extension (Chrome/Edge)

Programmatically: Use C2PA SDKs (Rust, JS, Python, Go)

Using software:

  • Adobe Photoshop/Lightroom (built-in)
  • Cameras: Nikon Z9/Z8, Leica M11-P, Sony Alpha series
  • Command-line: c2patool (see docs)

Requirements:

  • Certificate from trusted CA (DigiCert, GlobalSign, etc.)
  • Or self-signed cert for testing

See: Quick Start Guide for step-by-step instructions


Short answer: Nikon is developing C2PA support for their cameras. The Z6 III is planned to receive C2PA firmware in 2025, enabling in-camera signing of photos with provenance metadata.

Features (when available):

  • In-camera signing (no post-processing needed)
  • Records camera model, serial number, settings, GPS
  • Private key stored in secure hardware
  • Verifies authenticity from moment of capture
  • Ideal for photojournalism and legal evidence

Note: As of November 2025, Z9 and Z8 do not yet support C2PA despite earlier announcements.

Currently available:

  • Leica: M11-P, SL3
  • Sony: Alpha 1, A9 III, A7S III, A7 IV (with firmware update)

In development:

  • Nikon: Z6 III (firmware planned for 2025)
  • Canon: Exploring implementation

Creating C2PA content:

  • Adobe Firefly (automatic)
  • Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom (manual opt-in during export, JPEG only, Early Access)
  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • Capture One (via plugin)
  • c2patool (command-line)

Verifying C2PA:

  • Content Credentials Verify (web)
  • c2patool (command-line)
  • Browser extensions (Chrome, Edge)

Not automatically. C2PA doesn’t detect AI content - it records what the creator declares.

How it works:

  • AI tools (like DALL-E, Adobe Firefly) can add C2PA manifest stating “AI-generated”
  • Some tools (like Midjourney) use simpler IPTC metadata without C2PA verification
  • Relies on honest disclosure by the AI service
  • Proves the content came from that service (if signed)
  • Doesn’t detect undeclared AI content

Complementary: C2PA works with AI detection tools, not replaces them.

No. C2PA doesn’t prevent deepfake creation, but helps identify real content.

What C2PA does:

  • Proves authentic content is authentic (positive assertion)
  • Shows provenance of real photos/videos
  • Makes it harder to pass off manipulated content as original

What it doesn’t do:

  • Stop someone from creating deepfakes
  • Detect deepfakes without provenance data
  • Force people to use C2PA

Strategy: As authentic content adopts C2PA, content without C2PA becomes more suspicious.

15. How does C2PA label AI-modified content?

Section titled “15. How does C2PA label AI-modified content?”

Through assertions:

  • c2pa.actions records “AI enhancement” actions
  • digitalSourceType can specify “trainedAlgorithmicMedia”
  • Custom assertions for AI model info (optional)

Example manifest entry:

{
"action": "c2pa.edited",
"digitalSourceType": "trainedAlgorithmicMedia",
"softwareAgent": "Adobe Photoshop Generative Fill"
}

You control what’s included.

Optional information:

  • Creator name
  • GPS location
  • Custom metadata

Always included:

  • File hash
  • Timestamp
  • Signature
  • Certificate (identity depends on cert type chosen)

Privacy tips:

  • Use organizational certs instead of personal ones
  • Don’t include GPS if location is sensitive
  • Review manifests before publishing
  • Use pseudonymous identities if needed

Very difficult, but not impossible.

Strong protection:

  • 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECDSA cryptography
  • Private keys should be in HSMs (Hardware Security Modules)
  • CAs verify identity before issuing certificates

Risks:

  • Stolen private keys → revoke certificate immediately
  • Compromised Certificate Authority
  • Social engineering to obtain certificates

Best practices:

  • Hardware-based key storage
  • Regular certificate rotation
  • Monitor for suspicious signatures

18. What happens if my signing key is stolen?

Section titled “18. What happens if my signing key is stolen?”

Immediate actions:

  1. Revoke certificate through your CA
  2. Generate new key pair
  3. Notify stakeholders
  4. Review: check what was signed with compromised key

Impact:

  • Compromised key can forge your signature
  • Past signatures may be distrusted
  • Revocation status distributed through OCSP/CRL

Prevention:

  • Store keys in HSM or secure enclave
  • Use strong access controls
  • Regular security audits

Camera manufacturers: Nikon, Leica, Sony, Canon (coming)

Software companies: Adobe, Microsoft, Capture One

Media organizations: BBC, Reuters, New York Times (piloting)

AI companies:

  • OpenAI (DALL-E 3 with C2PA since Feb 2024)
  • Stability AI (exploring)
  • Note: Midjourney uses basic IPTC metadata but has not implemented full C2PA

Social platforms:

  • Meta (C2PA steering committee member since Sept 2024, rolling out labeling)
  • Twitter/X (exploring)

See: Organizations section in README

Currently: No. C2PA is voluntary.

Future possibilities:

  • Some governments considering requirements for news media
  • Platforms may require for verified accounts/monetization
  • Professional standards (journalism, legal) may adopt
  • Market pressure as adoption grows

Specification: Free and open (no license fees)

Implementation:

  • Open-source SDKs: Free
  • Certificate from CA: ~$200-500/year
    • S/MIME certificates (simplest): $200-300/year
    • Document signing certificates: $300-500/year
  • HSM for key storage: $500-5000+ (optional)
  • Development time: Varies

Free tools:

  • c2patool, SDKs, web verification - all free

22. Will social media platforms support C2PA?

Section titled “22. Will social media platforms support C2PA?”

Current status:

  • Exploring: Meta, Twitter/X
  • No public commitment yet from major platforms
  • Pilots: Some platforms testing internally

Challenges:

  • User-generated content volume
  • Performance/storage overhead
  • Unclear monetization
  • User education required

Likely adoption path:

  1. Optional verification badges
  2. Labeling content without C2PA
  3. Prioritization in feeds
  4. Requirements for certain content types

FeatureC2PAEXIF
SecurityCryptographically signedNo signature
Tamper detectionYesNo (easily modified)
StandardModern, extensibleOld, limited
Provenance chainYes (editing history)No
Creator identityVerified (with cert)Unverified text

Relationship: C2PA can include EXIF data within signed manifests.

PurposeC2PAWatermarks
Primary goalProvenance transparencyOwnership marking
RobustnessEasy to removeDesigned to survive attacks
InformationRich metadataLimited ID
VerificationCryptographicVisual or pattern detection
StandardsOpenMixed (open & proprietary)

Complementary: Can use both together.

AspectC2PABlockchain
StorageIn-file metadataOn-chain or hybrid
VerificationOffline capableRequires network
CostCertificate fee onlyTransaction fees
SpeedInstantMinutes
PrivacyContent can be privatePublic ledger
TechnologyPKIDistributed consensus

C2PA advantage: Simpler, faster, offline-capable, no crypto needed

Blockchain advantage: Immutable public record (if desired)

Hybrid: Some use C2PA + optional blockchain timestamping


Yes, you can retroactively add C2PA manifests to existing content.

Limitations:

  • Can’t prove when original was created (use current timestamp)
  • No in-camera signature proof
  • Still valuable for attribution and edit tracking going forward

Slightly. Typically adds 10-50 KB per manifest, depending on:

  • Number of assertions
  • Embedded thumbnails
  • Certificate chain length

Negligible for most use cases (< 1% increase for typical photos).

Can I use C2PA for private/confidential content?

Section titled “Can I use C2PA for private/confidential content?”

Yes. C2PA works fine with private content:

  • Manifests are embedded, not published separately
  • You control what metadata to include
  • Signatures don’t require public disclosure
  • Verification can be done offline

C2PA works normally. The manifest travels with the file whether it’s public or behind authentication.

No for basic verification:

  • Manifest and signatures are in the file
  • Certificate chain can be embedded
  • Offline verification fully supported

Optional internet use:

  • Check certificate revocation status (OCSP)
  • Download trust lists
  • Access cloud-based verification services

Indefinitely, as long as:

  • Certificate hasn’t been revoked
  • Cryptographic algorithms remain secure
  • Trust anchor (root CA) is still trusted

Note: Certificate expiration doesn’t necessarily invalidate past signatures (depends on implementation).

Yes, you can always remove C2PA metadata from your own files:

  • You own the content and metadata
  • Use metadata stripping tools
  • Re-save in C2PA-free format
  • Take screenshots/re-encode

What if I don’t trust a Certificate Authority?

Section titled “What if I don’t trust a Certificate Authority?”

Options:

  • Use different CA you trust
  • Implement custom trust anchors in your system
  • Accept only specific certificates (pinning)
  • Self-signed certs for closed ecosystems

C2PA allows multiple trust models, not just public CA system.


New to C2PA?

  1. Read: What is C2PA? in main README
  2. Try: Verify a sample
  3. Learn: Quick Start Guide
  4. Build: Check Tools & Libraries

Want to contribute?

  • See: CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Translate specifications
  • Add resources to awesome-c2pa
  • Share use cases

More questions?


Last updated: November 2025